Study PMI-SP Change and Corrective Action: key concepts, common traps, and exam decision cues.
Schedule change control and corrective action test whether you can recover performance without corrupting the schedule. PMI-SP expects formal change control, disciplined analysis, and proportionate corrective action.
The exam is not impressed by recovery moves that make the schedule look better but weaken its truth. Compression, resequencing, resource changes, or baseline updates all need analysis and approval discipline. If change control is weak, the schedule stops being a control tool and becomes a political artifact.
Strong answers distinguish between authorized change, corrective action inside the current baseline, and cosmetic manipulation. They also connect schedule decisions to scope, resources, and contractual commitments.
Stronger answers:
Weaker answers:
The team proposes rebaselining the schedule immediately after several late activities so the variance report looks clean again. What is the strongest PMI-SP response?
A. Rebaseline now because the original baseline is no longer useful B. Apply formal change-control discipline and distinguish between true approved change and cosmetic baseline reset C. Remove variance data from stakeholder reports until recovery is complete D. Ignore the late activities if the critical path did not change
Best answer: B
PMI-SP expects baseline discipline. B preserves schedule control by separating real change from cosmetic reset. A is often a weak attempt to hide performance. C reduces visibility. D may ignore meaningful noncritical deterioration.